Assessment of stroke. annotated bibliography Essay

Assessment of stroke. annotated bibliography - Essay Example There are grammatical and referencing errors through out and the structure is not clear at all times. 3/10 Description & analysis of each individual annotation Explanation, analysis and understanding of the main points of each selected article, e.g. purpose or hypothesis for study, the point of view/perspective from which the work was written, type and appropriateness of study methodology, comments on usefulness of the work & consideration of authority of authors. Relevant links to related sources are briefly identified (this may appear in more detail in the next two sections). Comments: You have selected a number of papers to discuss you the purpose of your study. Some of the papers linked better and some others not as well. For example, the FAST tool could be a topic on its own. The final paper could be used to support some of the arguments made in the earlier papers. You have given a description and the purpose of the studies in some papers and some others this was not as clear (i .e. first two ones). You have used a great deal of evidence in some of the papers although at times not in a coherent manner. You have also made some good comments and pointed to a number of issues that are important and you could discuss/explore further). 13/30 Analysis (from your chosen literature as a whole) Key issues/important factors appropriate to the topic are critically analysed. Connections between the selected articles, coherence (or lack of) between studies, referenced linkage to other related sources. Analysis & comparison of argument/s & opposing views appropriate to the topic area. Comments: This section follows on some of my comments above about the coherence of the papers and topics that each of them negotiate. It was a challenging topic and a very interesting one. Your comments here are clearer and you also bring most of the papers together. I would also expect here to bring some of the ideas explored in the papers. Critical analysis and evaluation was also carried out in the previous section. 12/35 Overall conclusions and recommendations Your main conclusions. Make focused recommendations for practice which demonstrate an integration of previous and new learning (synthesis). Propose recommendations for further research that can address the gaps identified through this annotated bibliography. Comments: You have made some good suggestions although some of them are not as well related to the annotated bibliography. These suggestions are the reflection of your overall clinical role with some relevant aspects to this essay. It should be more focused and tailored to the topic of this essay. You tend to discuss a number of ideas and that does not allow to explore a specific topic in depth. You have not made any recommendations for further research. 8/25 Diagnosis and Assessment Annotated Bibliography C7059609 The role of the Stroke Nurse in Assessment of Stroke Survivor Stroke is used to refer to a clinical syndrome of presumed vascular origin, typ ified by rapidly developing signs of focal or global